Criminal Defense Attorney and Criminal Defense Strategies

 Criminal Defense Attorney and Criminal Defense Strategies

Criminal Defense Attorney
 Criminal Defense Attorney and Criminal Defense Strategies


A criminal defense lawyer, is a lawyer (mainly lawyers) specializing in the defense of individuals and companies responsible for criminal activities. Some criminal defense lawyers are denied detention, while others in different jurisdictions work with criminal courts appointed to represent indigent persons; The terminology is inaccurate because each jurisdiction may have different practices with different levels of contribution from state law, federal law or consent decrees. Some jurisdictions use the appointment system alternately with judges who appoint a lawyer or a private consulting firm for each case.


Criminal defence strategies

Develop a defense with your lawyer in your criminal case.


In general, a criminal defense strategy will appear for your criminal prosecution as your criminal defense lawyer discovers more about what the prosecutor plans to do. Since each criminal case is different from each other, a specific criminal defense strategy is unique to the case in question. For example, if the prosecutor in one case describes the story of the defendant's presence at the scene, it is likely that the defense counsel will ask questions that may present a different story that shows the defendant elsewhere. In addition, how the criminal defendant behaves and responds to the questions posed by the prosecutor will also change the criminal defense strategy.


However, this does not mean that the criminal defendant and his lawyers sit and write false stories tend to show innocence. In general, an open and honest criminal defendant with his lawyer will have a better chance of defending himself. However, it is worth keeping in mind that the truth that the defendant sees is not always the one that the Prosecutor sees.


In fact, there are often multiple versions of the truth during a criminal procedure. For example, if the defendant is being tried for murder, there may be many different true stories. In a plot, the accused killed the victim in cold blood as a premeditated crime. In another account, the accused killed the victim only in self-defence after the victim tried to attack the defendant. The best criminal defense strategy comes when the defendant and the defense counsel present a truth-based story and show the accused in the best possible way. Keep in mind that even if the defendant is guilty, describing a story in a better light can lead to a deal or even conviction for a lesser charge or lesser penalty.


Criminal Defence: "The Truth"

A criminal defense lawyer is an expert in telling a true story in many different ways, just like a great storyteller. In fact, the prosecutor and the defense attorney can use the same basis for real-life events and present two completely different stories. You can think of it the way you might think about the map. On the map, you have states represented in their geographic areas with state boundaries in dark lines. However, the other map shows the state on a deteriorating color scale based on the average income of the population. While both maps are correct, it is unlikely to look anything like that. In the end, it is up to the criminal defense lawyer and the defendant to provide the best possible story about the defendant's situation.


based on the base of real evidence. For example, if the defendant's car was used as a car to escape, it was shown that the defendant's car had been stolen from his person to the weapons point on the same morning of the crime.

the ability to get sympathy for the judge or juror. For example, if possible, it was shown that the accused tried to withdraw from a crime before committing it, and even went so far as to report a possible crime to the police in an attempt to prevent the crime.

Explain and prove why the events that took place in the history of the accused are the real ones. For example, if the defendant claims that he was not at the crime scene at the time of the crime, the defendant's story must explain why the accused is not present.

It is important for the criminal defense to have an accurate story and contain the basic elements, based on the truth, that indicate the defendant's objective. The defendant and his lawyer must work carefully on this story before presenting it in court to ensure that no part of the story can be challenged by the facts.


Denial and guilty plea

It is almost impossible for defendants to have the same version of the events that occurred during the crime. In general, the defendant's story falls into one of three categories:


The story of "Confession." This is where the defendant confesses to the crime to his lawyer. For example, the defendant enters the lawyer's office and admits that "yes, I'll break into the car and I'll steal the radio, as well as the money in my glove."

The story of "complete denial." This is where the defendant denies all the charges brought by the prosecution against the defendant. Perhaps the most common full rejection stories are those that include an excuse. "There was no way for me to commit the crime that I was accused of. Actually, I was out of town with my girlfriend. Why are they accusing me of big theft? "


The story of "confess and explain." This kind of story usually falls between recognition and the story of denial. These stories usually involve a legal justification for "crime". For example, "They say I broke the car window and stole the radio and money. However, what I really did was use the key my friend gave me when he left the city to remove valuables from his car that was parked in a bad neighborhood. The glass must have been broken after i removed the radio and money from the car.

Develop a criminal defense strategy

After the criminal defendant tells his story to his criminal defense lawyers, they are likely to cooperate with each other to create a strategy that works best in court. In general, this strategy will depend on the story the accused tells his lawyer, but it is probably not exactly the same. Starting a defensive strategy is not as simple as telling the truth in a way that shows the innocence of the accused or diminishes his legal guilt. Instead, it often involves assessing the credibility of witnesses, discovering reputation sought between the community and the police, in addition to many other legal factors. In short, all these considerations will transform the "case theory" that will be based on the defendant."

To see how a fantastic criminal defense strategy is created, let's take a look at the example. Suppose that a criminal defendant has been charged with theft. The defendant went to a law firm and told his story, and also confessed to the police after his arrest. An eyewitness apparently identified the man shortly after the attack. The witness is unsure of his identity, but "certainly" he got it right. The defendant told his lawyer that although he was at the crime scene, he was not involved in the execution of the crime. Instead, he simply continued so his friends did not think less of him. Moreover, when the defendant was arrested,

In the three categories mentioned above, it is best to classify this story as a "confession" story because the accused was aware of the crime and was present at the time of the commission. However, the defense strategy is likely to be based on the theory that the police used a weak eyewitness account to present a stronger case, so they should have intimidated the accused until he confessed. This is a theory based on truth and shows the accused in a better way.

Putting this theory in court may be very useful to the defendant. In fact, the defense attorney is likely to file a motion for a trial in which he requests that the police confession be removed from the register, because the police committed themselves to an unconstitutional issue by not reading miranda's notice. In addition, it is also likely that the defense lawyer will try to question the eyewitness and prove that the identification was so fragile that it would not prove "beyond a doubt" the true identification of the perpetrator. Depending on the strength of the arguments, this theory may have its purpose in returning the case by no fault, or the prosecutor offering to negotiate the defenses on a lesser charge.

Introduction

Since lawyers are accused of being "passionate defenders" of their clients, it often means that they will provide training to their criminally charged clients in order to provide the best possible defense theory. In many cases, defense lawyers:

Use imaginary interviews to make defendants commit defense theory in memory,
bring the accused to the great crime scene in order to evoke memories, and
Ask the accused to write the story of the events as we have seen it from their point of view.
In addition, defense lawyers often explain the theory of the case used by the prosecution so that defendants include important factual elements in their statements. For example, if an essential part of the prosecution process is that the defendant was in a particular place at a given time, the defendant must remember to list a copy of the events that did not put him in that place at that time.

Defense lawyers must inform the defendants of different information about the prosecution case, so that the defendant knows what kinds of evidence they need to present. For example, Adolfo was presumed to have been charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Adolfo's lawyer can tell him:

Adolfo, you're charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery. What this really means to you is that you are tasked with planning with at least someone else to commit an armed robbery and taking steps to achieve that goal. Assistant Attorney General for your case, I know now that they are planning to show that you bought a gun after talking to Beto and Kiko. They claim that their conversation with Beto and Kiko was to plan the armed robbery and that their purchase of the weapon was in the interest of the crime. Now, do you have anything to tell me about buying a gun or talking to Beto and Kiko? "

Now, since Adolfo has this information, it would be better placed to give the defense attorney a story that explains the purchase of the weapon. For example, Adolfo could have purchased a weapon to defend himself against Beto and Kiko, who said they would hurt him if he did not participate in the armed attack discussed. Therefore, buying a weapon will not be in favor of crime.



The truth can be determined for free. . . In a short period of time.

Another reason the defendants should tell the defense lawyer that the whole truth is that it could lead to a lower charge. For example, if the defendant is accused of armed robbery, the defendant tells his lawyer that, yes, he stole the store, but not with any weapon, it may reduce the charge of petty theft, a crime far less serious in terms of potential prison time.

Learn about legal defenses with a free review of the case
There are a number of possible criminal defense strategies that may be available to you, depending on the nature of your case and individual facts. If you wish to invoke the "truth" or deny the allegations altogether, a criminal defense lawyer will be able to better explain all your options and the defenses that can be filed in your case. Start learning more today by getting a free review of the case from an experienced criminal defense attorney.